Jack Rotman did (or is doing) an interesting presentation at the 2015 Michigan Mathematics Meetings looking at Pre-Calculus reform. He draws an analogy to the current Developmental Mathematics reforms (alternative pathway, career-ready, etc.), shares some data on Michigan's approach to Pre-Calculus, and asks that big question "Are Pre-Calculus classes really preparing students for Calculus?"
I think its pretty safe to say that most states are in a similar situation regarding Pre-Calculus where colleges and universities have different requirements. In academia I know we don't like comparing institutions, but when students are transferring between different institutions (especially with costs going up) a certain level of state-wide consistency is beneficial to everyone. Students learn material that actually prepares them for the next course/future content, dropout rates lower (as a consequence of having to take less classes), completion times lower, etc.
My thoughts on teaching mathematics, using technology to teach, and finding ways to become better at both, with explorations into the education research literature. All thoughts my own, and not a reflection of any employer.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
A Simple Path Forward: Trading digital clutter for physical simplicity.
I talked to my 'rabbi' the other day, a senior faculty member in the department, and we talked over his observation of my class. He ...
-
In a previous post ( Pre-Pre-(Pre?)-Planning: Fall 2021 - Standards based grading, flipped classroom, corequisite support, and maybe group ...
-
Along with everyone else freaking out about Chat GPT ( John Dickerson did a nice segment on CBS ) I thought I might test it out with a few b...
-
I am hosting a professional learning community for my state-level organization (SBCTC) and am sharing some thoughts on how I am planning my...
No comments:
Post a Comment